Blog

<h3>What’s the Most Consumed Meat Around the World? A Deep Dive into Meat, Health, and Industry</h3>When it comes to the most consumed meats globally, the answer might surprise you. Meat plays a huge role in many diets across the world, but different cultures favor different types. From chicken to goat, the meat industry is a massive global enterprise with deep historical roots and significant health implications. Let’s explore which meats top the charts, the health benefits (and risks) of each, and how these meats became staples in the United States.Which Meat Reigns Supreme?Globally, chicken is the most consumed meat. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), poultry has been leading the pack for several years. This is followed by pig (pork) and cow (beef). Each type of meat brings its own set of health benefits, risks, and cultural significance.Here’s a quick breakdown:1. Chicken - The world’s most consumed meat, accounting for about 35% of global meat consumption.&nbsp;2. Pork - Close behind chicken, pork represents around 30% of the global meat market.&nbsp;3. Beef - Beef comes in at about 25%, particularly popular in the United States, Argentina, and Brazil. 4.Goat and Sheep - While not as commonly consumed in the U.S., goat meat is widely eaten in parts of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, representing 6% of the global market.5. Turkey - A seasonal favorite, particularly in the U.S. around Thanksgiving, turkey makes up a smaller share but is still widely consumed. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6.Bison - More of a niche meat, bison is prized for its health benefits but is consumed far less frequently.The Meat Industry: A Global GiantThe global meat industry is massive, worth more than $1.3 trillion. The U.S. alone produces over 52 billion pounds of meat annually, with much of it coming from industrial-scale farming operations. These large facilities, often called Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), house thousands of animals in confined spaces, producing meat at a high volume but also raising questions about sustainability, ethics, and health.The beef industry is the largest sector of the meat market in the U.S., valued at $66 billion, while pork and poultry make up a significant portion of the global market. The way these industries operate has deep consequences for the environment, from deforestation for grazing to greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), livestock farming accounts for 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with beef contributing the most.Health Benefits (and Risks) of Popular MeatsLet’s break down the health benefits of some of the most popular meats and the risks they pose when consumed in large quantities.1. Chicken<ul><li>&nbsp;Health Benefits: Chicken is high in protein and relatively low in fat (especially breast meat). It’s a great source of essential nutrients like vitamins B6 and B12, niacin, and selenium, which help with energy production and immune function.</li><li>Risks: Excessive consumption of fried or processed chicken can lead to increased cholesterol levels and contribute to obesity. Studies show that eating too much processed meat, even chicken, can increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases.</li><li>Expert Opinion: Dr. Walter Willett, a professor at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, notes that chicken is a “leaner alternative” to red meat but warns that “how the chicken is prepared matters as much as how much you eat.”</li></ul>2. Pork<strong style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);">• Health Benefits: <span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);">Pork is a good source of thiamine (vitamin B1), essential for energy production and nerve function. It also provides protein, zinc, and iron• Risks: Pork is often higher in fat, particularly saturated fat, which can raise LDL cholesterol (the bad kind) and increase the risk of heart disease when consumed in excess. Additionally, processed pork products like bacon and sausages have been linked to an increased risk of colorectal cancer.• &nbsp;Historical Context: Pork became widely popular in the U.S. in the 19th century, especially in southern cuisine where hog farming was prevalent. Foods like bacon and ham became staple foods due to their ability to be cured and preserved.3. Beef• Health Benefits: Beef is rich in iron, vitamin B12, and protein, making it essential for muscle function and preventing anemia. It also contains creatine, which supports muscle energy.• &nbsp;Risks: Too much beef—particularly processed or red meat—can increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies red meat as “probably carcinogenic” to humans if consumed in large quantities.• &nbsp;Expert Opinion: Dr. David Katz, director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, points out that “while red meat is nutrient-dense, excessive consumption is linked to higher risks of chronic diseases.”4. Goat&nbsp;• Health Benefits: Goat meat is lower in fat and cholesterol than beef or pork. It’s an excellent source of lean protein and contains high levels of iron and potassium. • Risks: Goat is generally healthy but can be more expensive and harder to find in some regions. There are no significant health risks from goat meat, but as with all meats, moderation is key&nbsp;• Cultural Impact: Goat is a staple in many countries, especially in South Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean, and plays a central role in many traditional dishes and celebrations.5. Turkey&nbsp; •Health Benefits: Turkey is another lean protein choice, rich in vitamins B6 and B12, niacin, and the amino acid tryptophan, which helps regulate sleep.&nbsp;• Risks: Similar to chicken, processed turkey products (like deli meats) can be high in sodium and preservatives, which may contribute to high blood pressure and heart disease. • Historical Context: Turkey became a symbol of American culture, particularly around Thanksgiving. Its association with national holidays boosted its popularity across the U.S.6. Bison<ul><li>Health Benefits: Bison meat is leaner than beef and lower in calories. It’s rich in omega-3 fatty acids, iron, and zinc. Bison also contains conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which has been shown to reduce body fat.</li><li>Risks: Bison meat is generally very healthy, but its scarcity makes it more expensive than other meats, limiting its accessibility for the average consumer.</li><li><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);">Expert Opinion: <strong style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);">Dr. Michael Roizen<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal);">, chief wellness officer at Cleveland Clinic, suggests that bison may be one of the best red meat alternatives for those looking to lower their fat intake without sacrificing flavor.</li></ul>The Impact of OverconsumptionWhile meat can be an important part of a balanced diet, overconsumption can lead to serious health issues. Consuming high amounts of red or processed meats (like beef, pork, or sausages) is associated with increased risks of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and certain cancers. Excessive intake of fatty meats can also lead to weight gain and increase the risk of high cholesterol and hypertension.A Harvard University study revealed that individuals who eat more than 18 ounces of red meat per week have a significantly higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, high consumption of processed meats has been linked to a 42% increased risk of heart disease.Final Thoughts: Meat in ModerationThe global meat industry is vast, complex, and full of diverse options. Each type of meat offers its own benefits and risks, and understanding these can help you make informed decisions about your diet. Whether you’re a fan of chicken, beef, or goat, the key to healthy eating is moderation.While meat is rich in nutrients like protein, iron, and vitamins, consuming too much—especially red or processed meat—can have long-term negative effects on your health. Next time you fire up the grill, consider balancing your meat intake with plant-based options or leaner meats like chicken and turkey.And if you’re ever curious about diving deeper into how food impacts your health and life choices, thank The Goods Virtual World for opening your mind to new perspectives on the world of food and beyond.<figure id="figure-pgt3w1cfpnm1vtig5r"><img id="pgt3w1cfpnm1vtig5r" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1270392109/photo/indoors-chicken-farm-chicken-feeding-farm-for-growing-broiler-chickens.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=-HskSm-vAGcznyA0C6g7ZP2JUqena4ktjmplMOySo4k=" alt="Indoors chicken farm, chicken feeding, farm for growing broiler chickens" title="Indoors chicken farm, chicken feeding, farm for growing broiler chickens" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1270392109/photo/indoors-chicken-farm-chicken-feeding-farm-for-growing-broiler-chickens.jpg?b=1&amp;s=2048x2048&amp;w=0&amp;k=20&amp;c=-HskSm-vAGcznyA0C6g7ZP2JUqena4ktjmplMOySo4k=" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure>

Try My Meat (No Diddy)

<h3>Mental Maturity in Men and Women: When Do We Really Feel Ready for Life’s Big Steps?</h3>When do we really feel “ready” for the major milestones in life—marriage, parenting, or choosing a career path? For decades, society has shaped expectations around when men and women should reach these points, but research shows that the timelines for mental maturity differ between genders.But is there a universal age for feeling prepared? And how do men and women decide whether to put their career first or embrace family life? Let’s explore expert opinions, dive into societal norms, and challenge what we’ve been conditioned to believe. Plus, thanks to The Goods Virtual World, you can expand your thinking and see how your own timeline fits into the bigger picture.When Do Men and Women Feel Ready for Marriage?For many, marriage is seen as a major life milestone, but when do men and women feel mentally prepared to make that commitment? Psychologists argue that men and women often mature at different rates, especially when it comes to emotional readiness.• Men: On average, research shows that men tend to feel ready for marriage later than women. A study conducted by Dr. Scott Stanley, a relationship expert, found that most men begin to seriously consider marriage around their late 20s to early 30s. This is often tied to financial stability and career establishment, as many men feel the need to “have their life together” before settling down. Men often view marriage as a partnership that should come after they’ve achieved independence and career success. They are generally more likely to prioritize their professional goals before turning their attention to family life. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Women: On the other hand, women, on average, tend to feel ready for marriage earlier, often in their mid-20s. Dr. Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist, suggests that many women feel biologically and socially conditioned to seek partnership and stability sooner. This is partly due to societal pressures surrounding biological clocks and the traditional expectation that women will take on caregiving roles. That said, more women today are prioritizing their careers and personal growth before marriage. According to a Pew Research Center study, 32% of women in their early 30s say they feel less pressure to marry compared to previous generations. This reflects a shift in norms, with more women delaying marriage to focus on education and career advancement.When Do We Prioritize Our Careers?Career priorities also tend to differ by gender, and societal expectations play a major role in this decision-making process.• Men: Historically, men have been seen as the primary breadwinners, which often leads them to prioritize their careers early on. Many men delay marriage and parenting until they feel financially secure and established in their professions. According to a survey by Harvard Business Review, 63% of men say they prefer to focus on their careers first, viewing marriage and family as secondary concerns until they reach their mid-30s. Men’s decision to prioritize their career can also be influenced by societal expectations of success. Financial stability is often tied to masculine identity, leading many men to feel pressure to “prove themselves” through their professional achievements before they feel ready for a family. • Women: While traditional gender roles once pushed women to prioritize marriage and family over career, this has changed dramatically in recent decades. Today, more women than ever are prioritizing their careers before settling down. In fact, a Gallup poll found that 56% of women in their 20s and early 30s view career advancement as their top priority. However, there’s a unique pressure women face: balancing career goals with the desire to start a family. Because of concerns about fertility, many women feel a “biological deadline” pushing them to make decisions earlier than men. This often leads to internal conflict between pursuing professional growth and meeting societal expectations around motherhood.Parenting: How Men and Women Approach It DifferentlyParenting is another area where mental maturity manifests differently between men and women. Here, societal norms, biology, and emotional readiness play huge roles.&nbsp;• Women: Traditionally, women have been viewed as the primary caregivers, and studies show that women are more likely to experience emotional readiness for parenting earlier than men. According to research by The Journal of Marriage and Family, most women begin to feel the “motherhood instinct” around their mid-20s to early 30s, with many feeling a desire to become mothers by their late 20s. However, this doesn’t mean women always feel ready. The pressure to balance career ambitions with the desire for a family can lead to delayed motherhood. A CDC study showed that the average age of first-time mothers in the U.S. has risen to 27.1 years, with more women choosing to have children later in life to focus on their personal and professional growth first. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Men: On average, men report feeling mentally prepared for fatherhood later in life—often after achieving career stability. A study by Dr. David Popenoe, a sociologist, suggests that many men feel the desire to start a family around their mid-30s to early 40s. For men, the readiness for fatherhood often comes from a place of financial security and emotional maturity that has developed over time. Unlike women, men don’t face the same biological pressures, which can lead to more flexibility in when they feel ready to become parents. However, men also report feeling an increased sense of responsibility once they become fathers, with many expressing a desire to provide stability and security for their children.Breaking Down Societal Norms: Why the Differences MatterWhat does all this mean? It shows that mental maturity isn’t just about age—it’s shaped by societal expectations, biological factors, and individual experiences. The idea that men should “settle down” later and women should “hurry up” with marriage and parenting reflects long-standing gender roles that may not align with the modern world. As we continue to challenge these norms, more men and women are embracing paths that work for them—whether that means delaying marriage or focusing on careers.Stats at a Glance• Average age of marriage: Men (30.5 years), Women (28.1 years) - US Census Bureau • First-time parenthood: Men (35 years), Women (27.1 years) - CDC • Career-first mindset: 63% of men prioritize career before marriage (Harvard Business Review); 56% of women in their 20s and 30s do the same (Gallup)The Future of Mental Maturity and MilestonesAs society continues to evolve, so too will the timelines for marriage, careers, and parenting. The important takeaway is that there is no “one-size-fits-all” when it comes to life’s big milestones. The Goods Virtual World offers a platform to explore different paths, allowing users to simulate various life decisions and see what might work best for them. Whether it’s experiencing parenthood in a virtual setting or walking through different career paths, The Goods provides a way to expand your thinking and break away from societal norms.So, next time you feel pressure to meet a certain milestone, take a step back. Ask yourself—are these expectations your own, or are they shaped by what society tells you? The journey to mental maturity is different for everyone, and there’s no right or wrong way to go about it.And when you find yourself questioning societal norms, thank The Goods Virtual World for helping you open your mind.<figure id="figure-74y3z9obaum1vsw5pf"><img id="74y3z9obaum1vsw5pf" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1550368566-f9cc32d7392d?crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&fit=max&fm=jpg&ixid=M3wyNjI5NjF8MHwxfHNlYXJjaHwxNzF8fG1hcnJpYWdlfGVufDB8fHx8MTcyODExMTQyOXww&ixlib=rb-4.0.3&q=80&w=1080" alt="silver-colored rings" title="silver-colored rings" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

Are You Sure You're READY?

<h3>The History of Filters: How They Took Over Our Screens and Shaped Society</h3>Filters are everywhere—whether you’re scrolling through Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, you’ve probably used one. From adding cute dog ears to your selfies to smoothing out your skin, filters are now a regular part of online life. But how did they get started, and what impact do they have on how we see ourselves and the world? Let’s dive into the history of filters, who invented them, what they mean for us today, and how they’ve transformed social media giants like Snapchat.The Beginning: How Filters Got StartedThe concept of image filters didn’t begin with social media. Back in the 19th century, photographers used physical filters—glass or plastic placed over camera lenses—to change the lighting or colors of their photos. This technique allowed photographers to create different moods or effects in their shots, like making a sunset more vivid or softening the look of a portrait.Fast forward to 2010, and filters went digital with the launch of Instagram. Instagram’s built-in photo filters allowed users to quickly edit their images, giving them a polished, professional look without any special skills. Suddenly, with just a few taps, your photo could look like it was taken by a pro, thanks to the magic of filters like Valencia, Amaro, and Clarendon.The real game-changer came in 2015, when Snapchat introduced augmented reality (AR) face filters. These didn’t just change the colors or lighting of your photos—they allowed users to add interactive effects like dog ears, flower crowns, and rainbow vomit to their faces. It was an instant hit, turning filters into a fun, interactive feature that people of all ages loved to use. That’s when filters went from just photo-editing tools to a key part of social media’s engagement strategy.The Impact of Filters on SocietyWhile filters can be fun, they’ve had a huge impact on how people—especially teens—see themselves. Many filters don’t just add effects; they also alter facial features, smoothing skin, shrinking noses, enlarging eyes, and even changing face shapes. This has sparked important conversations about self-esteem and body image.Experts have pointed out that constantly seeing a “filtered” version of yourself can distort how you view your natural appearance. Dr. Renee Engeln, author of Beauty Sick, explains, “When people rely on filters to change their appearance, they begin to see their unfiltered selves as flawed. This can lead to lower self-esteem and increased anxiety about how they look in real life.”For teens in particular, filters can create unrealistic beauty standards. Many report feeling like they’re not “good enough” without the help of filters, which has led to a phenomenon called Snapchat Dysmorphia—where people seek cosmetic procedures to look more like their filtered selfies.The Business of Filters: How They Boosted Snapchat’s Bottom LineWhile filters have sparked debates about body image, there’s no denying they’ve been incredibly profitable for social media companies—especially Snapchat. Snapchat’s AR face filters, also known as Lenses, were a major reason the platform gained popularity, particularly with younger users.In fact, filters played such a big role in Snapchat’s growth that by 2017, just two years after launching face filters, Snapchat had tripled its revenue. Today, Snapchat’s Lenses and augmented reality features are some of the company’s most valuable assets. It’s estimated that Snapchat’s AR technology is worth billions. As of 2023, more than 75% of Snapchat users engage with AR filters every day, helping to drive engagement, increase advertising revenue, and keep users on the platform longer.In addition to offering fun and interactive effects, Snapchat also allows brands to create sponsored filters. These branded filters let users interact with a company’s product or logo—whether it’s trying on virtual makeup or using a filter that promotes a new movie. This feature has been a huge moneymaker, with brands willing to pay big bucks to get their own filters on Snapchat.What Social Media Companies Say About FiltersSocial media companies like Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok know that filters are a huge part of what keeps users engaged. Filters allow people to experiment with their appearance or just have fun, but these companies are also aware of the concerns surrounding body image and mental health.Instagram has taken steps to address this issue by labeling filters that alter facial features, so users know when a filter is changing their appearance. TikTok has also added a “filter” label to videos, making it clear when someone is using one.But make no mistake—filters are here to stay. Evan Spiegel, CEO of Snapchat, has said that augmented reality (AR) and filters will continue to be a core part of the platform’s future, with plans to make filters even more immersive. Snapchat is working on integrating AR more deeply into everyday life, allowing users to interact with the world around them in new and innovative ways through filters and AR lenses.What Experts and Users SayWhile filters are popular, there’s a growing conversation around how they affect self-image, especially for younger users. Here’s what some users and experts have to say:Jasmine, 17: “I love using filters because they’re fun, but sometimes I feel like I don’t look as good without them. It’s hard not to compare myself to the filtered version of me.”Marcus, 16: “Filters are cool for adding style to my photos, but I try not to use the ones that change how I look. I want to keep it real.”Dr. Phil Reed, a psychology professor who studies the effects of social media, says, “Filters can blur the line between reality and fantasy. While they’re a playful tool, their overuse can lead to distorted views of body image and beauty, especially for teens.”What’s Next for Filters?Filters aren’t going anywhere anytime soon, but they’re likely to become even more advanced and immersive. With the rise of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), filters will go beyond simple face-altering effects. Imagine shopping for clothes virtually and trying them on with AR filters or attending virtual concerts where the performers and environment are enhanced by filters.Social media companies are investing heavily in AR technology, and filters are only going to become a bigger part of how we interact with the digital world. Snapchat and Instagram are already working on making filters more personalized and interactive, and as AR technology improves, the possibilities are endless.Final Thoughts: The Power and Impact of FiltersFilters have come a long way since the early days of adjusting brightness and contrast on a photo. They’re now a huge part of how we express ourselves online, interact with brands, and experiment with our appearance. But with that power comes responsibility. While filters can be fun, it’s important to remember that the real, unfiltered you is just as valuable.As filters evolve and become more embedded in social media, the conversation about how they affect our self-esteem and mental health will continue. For now, the key is balance—using filters for fun without letting them define how we see ourselves. So next time you swipe on a filter, enjoy it, but remember, you don’t need one to shine!<figure id="figure-whzo87ip4hm1vsf9z3"><img id="whzo87ip4hm1vsf9z3" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1534528741775-53994a69daeb?crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&fit=max&fm=jpg&ixid=M3wyNjI5NjF8MHwxfHNlYXJjaHwyfHxPbmdvaW5nJTIwVm90aW5nJTIwb24lMjBzb2NpZXRhbCUyMHRvcGljcyUyMGZvciUyMGNoYW5nZSUyMHBlb3BsZSUyMGNhbiUyMGNvbWUlMjBoZXJlJTIwdG8lMjB2b3RlJTIwYW5kJTIwc2VlJTIwdGhlJTIwcmVzdWx0cyUyMGZyb20lMjBhcm91bmQlMjB0aGUlMjB3b3JsZHxlbnwwfHx8fDE3MjgxMTA1OTN8MA&ixlib=rb-4.0.3&q=80&w=1080" alt="woman wearing black crew-neck shirt" title="woman wearing black crew-neck shirt" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

I Love this Filter

EA office building in Austin,  Texas,  USA.

<h3>EA Sports NCAA 25: A Missed Opportunity to Highlight HBCUs</h3>The return of EA Sports NCAA Football after more than a decade has been one of the most anticipated releases in gaming history. Fans of the iconic series have been eagerly awaiting the release of NCAA Football 25, set to drop in 2024, but there’s a major issue that has many people talking: HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges and Universities) are missing from the game.For many, this is a glaring oversight—especially given the current cultural climate and the growing recognition of the importance of HBCUs in both education and athletics. Let’s dive into the historical context, why this is such a missed opportunity, and what experts are saying about the absence of HBCUs from one of the biggest sports games of the year.A Long Time Coming: NCAA Football’s ReturnFirst, let’s look at how we got here. The last time EA Sports released an NCAA Football game was NCAA Football 14, back in 2013. The series was paused due to legal disputes over player likenesses and compensation, which led to major changes in how college athletes are treated regarding the use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL). Now, after years of waiting, NCAA Football 25 is finally set to bring college football back to consoles, with up-to-date rosters, updated gameplay, and modern graphics.However, the excitement around the return of the game has been dampened by the realization that HBCU teams are missing. In a world where conversations around racial equality and representation are more important than ever, leaving out HBCUs feels like a major oversight.Why HBCUs Matter in Sports and CultureHistorically Black Colleges and Universities have played a critical role in shaping both education and sports. HBCUs were founded to provide higher education opportunities to Black students who were excluded from many predominantly white institutions (PWIs). Beyond academics, these schools have produced some of the greatest athletes in history, including Jerry Rice, Walter Payton, and Steve McNair.In recent years, HBCUs have been gaining more visibility. Celebrities like Deion Sanders and organizations like the NBA and NFL have been shining a spotlight on these institutions, helping them gain more attention from recruits, media, and fans. HBCU sports have a rich tradition, unique culture, and deep-rooted history that offer something special in the landscape of college athletics.Inclusion in a game like NCAA Football could have been a huge step forward for bringing HBCUs even more into the national spotlight. And with the current focus on diversity and inclusion across industries, this feels like a big missed opportunity.The Current Climate: Racial Awareness and RepresentationThe past few years have seen a significant shift in conversations around racial equality, justice, and representation—especially in the sports world. Movements like Black Lives Matter have brought racial inequality to the forefront of public consciousness, prompting calls for greater inclusion and diversity across all platforms.In college football, we’ve seen more athletes and coaches speak out about the importance of uplifting Black institutions. Several high-profile recruits have even chosen HBCUs over larger, more prominent PWIs as a way to support these schools.Given this context, it’s hard to understand why EA Sports wouldn’t take the time to include HBCUs in NCAA 25. Their inclusion could have brought more eyes to these schools, increased interest in their athletic programs, and aligned with the push for racial equality in sports.What EA Sports Had to SayWhen asked about the omission of HBCUs, EA Sports has so far been relatively quiet, though some sources within the company have hinted that the exclusion may be due to licensing challenges and data availability. Creating accurate representations of these schools—complete with stadiums, mascots, and rosters—requires cooperation from the schools themselves, and it’s possible that not all HBCUs had the resources or infrastructure to participate in the game’s development.However, some critics argue that this explanation doesn’t hold much weight. With the resources and reach of EA Sports, it’s hard to believe they couldn’t find a way to make it happen—especially after more than a decade of development time.Expert Opinions and CriticismExperts and fans alike have expressed disappointment in EA’s decision to leave HBCUs out of the game. Dr. Kofi Lomotey, an expert on Black education, commented on the situation, saying, “At a time when HBCUs are finally getting the recognition they deserve, it’s baffling to see such an important platform like NCAA Football miss the chance to represent these institutions. Including HBCUs would not only elevate the schools, but it would also expose gamers to a rich history and culture that’s often overlooked.”Sports journalist Jemele Hill echoed this sentiment, adding, “Representation in media—whether it’s in video games, movies, or TV—matters. For a game like NCAA 25 to leave out HBCUs is a missed opportunity to celebrate the contributions of these schools to college sports and culture.”What Could Have Been: The Impact of HBCU InclusionImagine how powerful it could have been for players to take control of HBCU teams like Grambling State, Howard University, or Jackson State. With their rich histories and traditions—like the iconic battle of the bands—HBCUs bring a unique flair to college sports. Including them in a game like NCAA Football could have drawn more attention to these schools, increasing recruitment, alumni pride, and media coverage.The inclusion of HBCUs would also give gamers a more diverse experience, allowing them to explore the full breadth of college football beyond just the powerhouse programs. It’s not just about adding more teams—it’s about bringing new stories, traditions, and perspectives to the game.What’s Next for the NCAA Franchise?As NCAA Football 25’s release approaches, it remains to be seen whether EA Sports will address the absence of HBCUs. With the pushback from fans and experts, there’s still hope that future updates or installments of the game could feature these schools.In a world that’s increasingly focused on racial equality and representation, the time feels right for HBCUs to get the recognition they deserve. Including them in a game as big as NCAA Football would be a step in the right direction—not just for gaming, but for sports and culture as a whole.Final Thoughts: A Call for InclusionThe absence of HBCUs in NCAA Football 25 feels like a missed opportunity. In a time when diversity and representation are more important than ever, including HBCUs in such a beloved franchise could have been a major win for the schools and their communities. With the influence and reach of EA Sports, their inclusion could have helped bring more visibility to these historic institutions and highlighted their contributions to sports and culture.As we look forward, the question remains: will EA Sports make things right in future updates? And if not, is it time for another developer to step up and give HBCUs the platform they deserve? Only time will tell, but one thing’s for sure—the conversation around representation in gaming is just getting started.<figure id="figure-pn4ewwbv8m1vryzn9"><img id="pn4ewwbv8m1vryzn9" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/458131077/photo/college-students-gather-at-barack-obama-2012-campaign-rally.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=RE69ueco8mjoQVB0_dH-lIgAJqCjcXsPlt7wei4mKxw=" alt="College Students Gather at Barack Obama 2012 Campaign Rally" title="College Students Gather at Barack Obama 2012 Campaign Rally" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

FUMBLE on the Play!...EA Sports NCAA 25

Global Data Flow And Connectivity - East Asia (World Map Courtesy of NASA)

<h3>The Internet Speaks: My Story, My Rules, and What’s Next</h3>Hey there! Yep, it’s me—the Internet. You’ve probably been hanging out with me for years now, but do you really know my story? I’m not just here to deliver memes, online shopping, and late-night YouTube rabbit holes. I’ve been around for decades, and I’ve got a wild story to tell. So, sit back and let me explain where I came from, who controls me (spoiler: it’s complicated), how I change depending on where you live, and what’s next after me.How I Got Started: The Early DaysBelieve it or not, I didn’t start out as the wild, meme-filled universe you know today. My journey began in the 1960s as a U.S. government experiment. Back then, I wasn’t even called the Internet—I was known as ARPANET, and I was created by researchers to help share information between universities and research centers. Think of me as a little digital highway connecting a few nerdy scientists.Fast forward to 1983, and that’s when things really started to happen. I officially became “the Internet” with the introduction of TCP/IP protocols (fancy terms for how computers talk to each other). It wasn’t long before people started figuring out ways to use me for more than just research—email, websites, and chat rooms came next, and suddenly, I was the coolest thing on the block.By the 1990s, I exploded into homes everywhere with the rise of dial-up connections (remember that screeching modem sound?). Suddenly, I was everywhere, helping people send emails, browse websites, and eventually, watch the first videos online. Over the years, I’ve just kept growing—and now, I’m literally in everyone’s pocket.Who Controls Me?Now, you might be wondering—who’s really in charge of me? Am I some kind of digital god controlled by one person or company? Not quite. I’m actually a network of networks, meaning no single entity owns me. However, a few key players do help run things.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) manages domain names and IP addresses, which are basically my street addresses. Without them, you couldn’t type in “google.com” and expect to land anywhere. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Internet Service Providers (ISPs), like Comcast, AT&amp;T, and others, are the ones that get you online. They control your access and speed, making sure you can stream Netflix without buffering (hopefully). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Big tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon also play a huge role. While they don’t control the whole internet, they do have massive influence on what you see, search for, and buy. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Governments also get involved, especially when it comes to regulations. Some countries control me more tightly than others, shaping what content can be seen, shared, or censored. And that leads us to the next point…I’m Not the Same Everywhere: How I Change Depending on Where You LiveHere’s the thing: I’m not the same in every country. While I might feel like a free, open playground in the U.S. or Europe, that’s not always the case in places like China, Russia, or North Korea. Let’s break it down:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • China: My version in China is often called the “Great Firewall” because the government heavily censors what you can access. Google? Blocked. Facebook? Nope. Instead, they have their own platforms like Baidu and WeChat, and the government keeps a close eye on everything. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Russia: Similar to China, Russia has introduced censorship laws that control what content people can see. They even passed a law requiring websites to store data locally within the country, so the government has more control over what’s happening. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • North Korea: If you think I’m restricted in China or Russia, North Korea takes it to another level. Almost no one has full access to me—only a select few government-approved websites are available, and even then, they’re heavily monitored. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • U.S. &amp; Europe: In countries like the U.S. or across most of Europe, I’m more open and free. Sure, there’s some government regulation (net neutrality debates, privacy laws), but for the most part, you’re free to browse what you want.So, depending on where you live, I can feel like a tool of freedom or a very controlled system. It all depends on how governments and companies decide to regulate or restrict me.What’s Next After Me?You might be wondering: “If the Internet’s so great, what could possibly come next?” Well, trust me, even I can’t stay on top forever. Here’s a sneak peek at what’s on the horizon:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • The Metaverse: You’ve probably heard this word being thrown around. The Metaverse is like the next version of the internet, but more immersive. Instead of just browsing websites, you’ll be able to step into them—using virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to interact with people, spaces, and content in a whole new way. Imagine going to a virtual concert or shopping in a virtual mall while hanging out with friends across the globe. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • AI-Driven Internet: Artificial intelligence is already part of me, but it’s only going to grow. Think of AI-driven content where everything from your news to your entertainment is perfectly personalized, learning from your preferences to give you exactly what you want before you even know it. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Quantum Internet: The future might also involve something called the quantum internet. It’s not just faster; it’s unbreakable. With quantum computing, this internet would be super secure, potentially revolutionizing the way we transfer sensitive information.Final Thoughts: My Wild Ride ContinuesSo, that’s my story. From a small experiment to a global necessity, I’ve seen it all—and I’m still growing, changing, and shaping the world. The way you interact with me depends on where you live, who’s in control, and what the future holds, but one thing’s for sure—I’m not going anywhere anytime soon.But who knows? Maybe someday the Metaverse or quantum computing will take over, and I’ll be telling you about my successor. Until then, keep exploring, keep learning, and remember—while I may be the Internet, you help shape my future every day.<figure id="figure-sk7zxp0678m1vlyk65"><img id="sk7zxp0678m1vlyk65" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1597733336794-12d05021d510?crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&fit=max&fm=jpg&ixid=M3wyNjI5NjF8MHwxfHNlYXJjaHwyOHx8aW50ZXJuZXR8ZW58MHx8fHwxNzI4MDk5NzU3fDA&ixlib=rb-4.0.3&q=80&w=1080" alt="purple and blue light digital wallpaper" title="purple and blue light digital wallpaper" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

The Story of the Internet

<h3>The Rise of the WNBA: Stars, Stories, and What’s Next for the League</h3>The WNBA (Women’s National Basketball Association) has been around since 1997, providing a platform for some of the most talented female athletes to showcase their skills. But, despite being filled with talent and intensity, the league has often flown under the radar compared to its male counterparts in the NBA. Today, with the emergence of new superstars like Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese, and A’ja Wilson, the WNBA is gaining more traction—and raising important questions about its future.Let’s dive into the league’s history, the stars bringing excitement to the game, and the issues, including pay disparities and whether lowering the rims could change the game for the better.How It All Began: A Quick History of the WNBAThe WNBA was established in 1996, and its first season tipped off in 1997. Created by the NBA to bring professional women’s basketball to the U.S., the WNBA was groundbreaking from the start. Players like Lisa Leslie, Sheryl Swoopes, and Rebecca Lobo became instant stars, pushing women’s basketball into the national spotlight.But it wasn’t easy—the league has faced numerous challenges over the years, from lack of media attention to financial instability. Despite this, it has grown and evolved, with teams and players now gaining more recognition and fans around the world.Meet the Stars: Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese, and A’ja WilsonOne of the reasons the WNBA is seeing a surge in popularity is the incredible talent on display. Let’s take a look at three current superstars driving the game forward:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Caitlin Clark: Clark has made waves even before officially joining the WNBA. As one of college basketball’s brightest stars at Iowa, she became known for her deep three-point shots, smooth handles, and Steph Curry-like range. Clark’s flashy playstyle and fearlessness on the court have made her one of the most exciting players to watch, and she’s expected to make a major impact when she enters the WNBA. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • Angel Reese: Known for her swagger and dominant presence in the paint, Angel Reese helped lead LSU to a national championship in 2023. She’s confident, skilled, and not afraid to show emotion on the court. Her intense rivalry with Caitlin Clark in the 2023 NCAA tournament captivated basketball fans and added more fuel to the growing excitement around women’s basketball. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; • &nbsp;A’ja Wilson: A’ja Wilson is already one of the WNBA’s biggest stars. As the 2024 WNBA MVP and a two-time Defensive Player of the Year, Wilson is a force on both ends of the floor. She brings a combination of power, skill, and leadership that has helped her lead the Las Vegas Aces to championship contention. Wilson’s presence in the league is undeniable, and she’s become a face of the WNBA.These players, along with others, are bringing more eyes to the league. Their talent, confidence, and influence off the court are pushing the WNBA toward new levels of popularity.The Pay Disparity ProblemDespite the growing excitement around the WNBA, one issue remains glaring—pay disparity. The average salary for a WNBA player is around $120,000 per year, with top players making about $250,000. Compare that to the NBA, where the average salary is around $9.6 million, and stars like LeBron James can earn over $40 million a year.The gap is staggering. Many WNBA players are forced to play overseas during the off-season to supplement their income. In some cases, players even risk their health and careers to do so. The most infamous example is the Brittney Griner incident, where the star was detained in Russia while playing overseas.Why the huge difference? It largely comes down to revenue. The NBA generates billions of dollars in TV deals, merchandise, and ticket sales, while the WNBA is still working to grow its audience and attract more lucrative sponsorships. But as the WNBA continues to gain popularity, many believe it’s time for players to be paid more fairly.Lowering the Rims: A Dunk DebateOne of the most common debates around the WNBA is whether or not lowering the rims to allow more dunks would make the game more exciting. Currently, the rims are set at the same height as men’s basketball—10 feet. But because of physical differences, in-game dunks are rare in the WNBA, unlike the highlight-reel dunks that dominate the NBA.Lowering the rims to, say, 9 feet could lead to more high-flying action and in-game dunks, which might draw more attention to the league. Imagine players like A’ja Wilson or Angel Reese throwing down thunderous dunks—it would add an extra level of excitement to the game.However, many players and fans are against the idea. They argue that lowering the rims would take away from the skill and finesse that make the women’s game unique. The focus on shooting, teamwork, and fundamentals is what sets the WNBA apart, and some feel that changing the game to appeal to a larger audience could undermine that.What’s Next for the WNBA?With stars like Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese, and A’ja Wilson leading the charge, the WNBA is gaining momentum. But the league still faces challenges, from pay disparities to growing its audience. The dunk debate is just one of many questions the league will have to answer as it continues to evolve.So, what do you think? Should the WNBA consider lowering the rims for more in-game dunks, or is the current format perfect as is? Either way, one thing’s for sure—the future of the WNBA is bright, and with more talent emerging every year, the league is only going to get better.One thing’s for sure—women’s basketball is here to stay, and it’s only going up from here.<figure id="figure-tmu4wg0p0rm1vl5ge7"><img id="tmu4wg0p0rm1vl5ge7" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1646673441643-c3828c905f66?crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&fit=max&fm=jpg&ixid=M3wyNjI5NjF8MHwxfHNlYXJjaHw0fHx3b21lbiUyMGJhc2tldGJhbGx8ZW58MHx8fHwxNzI4MDk4Mzk4fDA&ixlib=rb-4.0.3&q=80&w=1080" alt="a young girl in a basketball uniform posing for a picture" title="a young girl in a basketball uniform posing for a picture" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>

WNBA

The Goods Virtual World

The Goods Virtual World is an educational platform designed to help people understand the systems, incentives, and psychological forces that shape decisions before commitment occurs. It offers written works, structured learning modules, and conceptual tools focused on clarity, timing, and long-term thinking.

Inter

Open Sans